Prediction of Jim Pugh vs Danie Visser Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Pugh vs D. Visser

Jim Pugh

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Danie Visser

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Pugh 1 - 0 Visser

They have played 3 sets in total, with Jim Pugh winning 2 and Danie Visser winning 1. The last match between Jim Pugh and Danie Visser was at the Newport, 10-07-1989, Round: SF, Surface: Grass, with Jim Pugh getting the victory 6-4 6-7 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pugh	1
Visser	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SF) Newport(07-10-89)

Stats

Jim Pugh

Danie Visser

J. Pugh vs D. Visser H2H Profile

J. Pugh	Stats	D. Visser
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
51.34% (115-109)	Career Total W/L	44.05% (111-141)
1	Grass	0
1	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Pugh vs D. Visser Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jim Pugh has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Danie Visser has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jim Pugh, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Danie Visser has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jim Pugh has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danie Visser has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jim Pugh has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Danie Visser winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jim Pugh has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 10/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 55/57). Danie Visser has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 6/17).
Player level: In the last year, Jim Pugh has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Danie Visser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jim Pugh winning 1 times and Danie Visser being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jim Pugh winning 2 and Danie Visser winning 1.
The last match between Jim Pugh and Danie Visser was at the Newport, 10-07-1989, Round: SF, Surface: Grass, with Jim Pugh getting the victory 6-4 6-7 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jim Pugh has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Danie Visser has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jim Pugh has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danie Visser has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jim Pugh has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danie Visser has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jim Pugh vs Danie Visser Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Pugh vs D. Visser H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Pugh	Stats	D. Visser
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Pugh Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
New Haven - 14-08-1995
R1 Mats WilanderM. Wilander	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Los Angeles - 31-07-1995
R1 Mark PhilippoussisM. Philippoussis	L	7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(7)	Stats
Newport - 06-07-1992
R1 David WheatonD. Wheaton	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
U.S. Open - 26-08-1991
R1 Grant StaffordG. Stafford	L	6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3	Stats
Indianapolis - 12-08-1991
R2 Jim CourierJ. Courier	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

D. Visser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berlin - 07-10-1991
R1 Udo RiglewskiU. Riglewski	L	7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 05-08-1991
R1 Ronald AgenorR. Agenor	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(2)	Stats
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Berlin - 08-10-1990
R1 Franco DavinF. Davin	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Pugh vs D. Visser Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Pugh	Stats	D. Visser
51.34% (115/109)	YTD Win/Loss	44.05% (111/141)
50.26% (293/290)	Sets Win/Loss	46.67% (315/360)
50.28% (2813/2782)	Games Win/Loss	49.16% (3314/3427)
49.11% (55/57)	Hard Win/Loss	45.19% (61/74)
53.85% (35/30)	Clay Win/Loss	26.09% (6/17)
51.72% (15/14)	Indoor Hard W/L	48.00% (12/13)
55.56% (10/8)	Grass Win/Loss	46.38% (32/37)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
225.13	Average Opponent Rank	379.74
36.67% (11/19)	Slam W/L	48.94% (23/24)
40.00% (10/15)	Masters W/L	41.38% (12/17)
51.20% (64/61)	Main Tour W/L	39.31% (57/88)
68.18% (30/14)	Challenger W/L	61.29% (19/12)
54% (103/190)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (85/199)
35% (12/34)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	48% (25/52)
50% (3/6)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	67% (2/3)
53% (46/86)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (37/89)
81% (113/91)	1st Set Won, Won Match	72% (121/87)
19% (113/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	28% (121/34)
22% (111/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (130/23)